Hello, first of all, greetings. As a seasoned gamer in the gaming industry for years and one of the precious players who has made many efforts for the development of this sector, I would like to share with you the true disgrace of Cyberpunk 2077 in this review.

In this review, you won't find standard topics such as gameplay, graphics, performance, etc. Instead, I will tell you how this game has truly harmed the gaming industry. In 2015, when CD Projekt released its first "masterpiece" game, everything started. Despite the game being in a terrible state, the player community defined The Witcher 3 as a masterpiece and practically deified the game under the guise of subjective criticism. This situation created a job vacancy for the upcoming expansions, and CD Projekt geared up for new expansion packs. Developers directed every kind of question to players, asking for support with the message, "We are looking for your ideas to improve our game, which is not fully finished yet." What did the player base do? Instead of contributing to the game's development, they further deified it, and as a result, CD Projekt couldn't complete the desired project. As a consequence, a large part of the staff was laid off just before the development process of Cyberpunk 2077 began, leading to the disaster of Cyberpunk 2077.

CD Projekt insisted on one thing, and that was the use of the RedEngine, which was not really ready for this project. As mentioned earlier, the mass layoff of employees, new developers needing time to adapt to this game engine, and naturally, the extra effort of catching up with the performance of the old developers caused problems. Considering the promises made to investors and the deadlines, the Cyberpunk 2077 project officially started with disgusting deadlines.

Although the developers were exceptionally talented, the management of the departments was so miserable that no project could be completed properly, and the final version of the game couldn't be put together. Instead of allocating the budget to development plans, CD Projekt directed so much to advertising that they eventually started to experience budget problems. They shamelessly hid this situation from players before the game was released. Even worse, they claimed that the game had evolved into the "Gold" version and was ready to be released. However, all we had was a huge and unsuccessful technology demo, not a product.

We paid a standard AAA game price for this game, but what we got in return was just a glitch-fest.

This single-player game was continuously updated for three years as if it were an online multiplatform game, and it was presented to us repeatedly. I just want to ask, do we have to lend studios $60 to play the final version of a game? Polish studios tend to make this move nowadays. Take, for example, Dying Light 2... When it was first released and couldn't deliver the expected performance, Dying Light 2, today, with the Dying Light 2: Reloaded version, claims to have "rebuilt the game from scratch."

Look, I don't want to drag this on any longer. The game is now playable and enjoyable, especially thanks to the Phantom Liberty Expansion. However, this doesn't change the fact of the past three years of update chaos. I paid $60 and got the result three years later. Instead of praising and deifying CD Projekt for no reason, as a player community, let's contribute to the development of this studio so that we can finally see good games from CD Projekt.

Buy this game, play it, have fun, but don't have any respect because CDPR has deceived a whole gaming industry and player base with this game.

Thank you.

✮ Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022 Beta) Review ✮

Firstly, before I dive into my entire review, I want to emphasize that this game has earned the title of the most detailed Call of Duty ever.

Thanks to my sponsorship, I spent 1500TL to purchase the Vault Edition of this game. Initially, I thought there was no way a game like Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 could justify this price tag. However, when I opened the game, I was genuinely shocked. The game featured numerous modes, standing alone as a game that challenges not only Counter-Strike but also the Battlefield series and Battle Royale games. With Warzone 2.0 in the making and on the way, how did they manage to fill this game with so many modes in just two years?

Never before in Call of Duty history have we seen such a detailed, meticulous, and worked-on project. Even the brightest stars in the Call of Duty series did not receive such detailed attention. Despite not releasing campaign sections yet, I am witnessing an incredible job.

In the last five years, I have not played such a clean Beta process. The game has almost no glitches, the optimization is incredibly high, none of the weapons are problematic, and the gameplay is well-polished. If they released the game at 150TL like this, saying "Here's a random multiplayer game for you," it would have sold like hotcakes.

The game features a mode challenging Battlefield with 64 players in 32 vs. 32 teams. You can ride tanks, helicopters, cars, and motorcycles, creating a chaotic battlefield for you.

If that game mode isn't enough for you, try Prisoner Rescue for a more tactical gameplay experience. And if that's still not sufficient, enjoy Search and Destroy, challenging your opponents with tactical bomb disposal mechanics instead of CS.

If I detailed all the game modes here, I would probably have to write a book, and this is just the BETA, mind you. I can't even imagine what the full version of the game will be like.

Weapon modifications are vastly improved compared to previous Call of Duty titles. You can turn a heavy machine gun into an SMG in this game. While the game has limited features, it creates an unlimited visual playground for the player. Everyone's using different weapons, perks, operator abilities, providing an incredibly diverse gaming experience.

Of course, the downside of the game is its price, but since many have commented on that, I won't dwell on it.