安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The 'Pillar of Order' one - spend time in a region low public order - seems a little strange. Again I'd chop the upkeep reduction out of it. It's not possible to reduce the cost of public order buildings specifically, is it?
I especially like the Recruiter trait - you did very well with that. Useful, yet not overpowered, and it takes a long time to get (because my lords spend soo little time in recruiting stance :P)
The reason I harp on about so much about the upkeep reductions is because you can stack quite a lot of them for ridiculous purposes. Providing you keep one army (not difficult at all earlygame), there is no supply lines upkeep increase, and if your lord gets a trait to reduce upkeep (eg Lokhir -50% upkeep on Corsairs), some skills later you can get that to -80% or so, then you only need a teeeny tiiny bit to push that to -100% :D
Not that I don't like upkeep reductions on traits like Campaigner .... but getting a random -10% upkeep for trashing Skaven a couple of times seems a little silly :S
But the early turns are much more important than the later turns; a free army earlygame is much, much more important when every cent of cash counts; as opposed to Turn 100+ when you kind of stop caring about money :P
After looking at the trait list, this is my fear, too.
You realize that was a post from almost 2 years ago and that everything in this post has since then been balanced out?