Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告








The 'Pillar of Order' one - spend time in a region low public order - seems a little strange. Again I'd chop the upkeep reduction out of it. It's not possible to reduce the cost of public order buildings specifically, is it?
I especially like the Recruiter trait - you did very well with that. Useful, yet not overpowered, and it takes a long time to get (because my lords spend soo little time in recruiting stance :P)
The reason I harp on about so much about the upkeep reductions is because you can stack quite a lot of them for ridiculous purposes. Providing you keep one army (not difficult at all earlygame), there is no supply lines upkeep increase, and if your lord gets a trait to reduce upkeep (eg Lokhir -50% upkeep on Corsairs), some skills later you can get that to -80% or so, then you only need a teeeny tiiny bit to push that to -100% :D
Not that I don't like upkeep reductions on traits like Campaigner .... but getting a random -10% upkeep for trashing Skaven a couple of times seems a little silly :S
But the early turns are much more important than the later turns; a free army earlygame is much, much more important when every cent of cash counts; as opposed to Turn 100+ when you kind of stop caring about money :P
After looking at the trait list, this is my fear, too.
You realize that was a post from almost 2 years ago and that everything in this post has since then been balanced out?