Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you're interested EctoSage, I'd be willing to upload them to the workshop (while providing credit, of course).
planets has arrived. Yay !!!!
yeah i did that, but i was also on the planet map which has gravity, and neither thing worked
agreed but you may ned just some small reactors around the rover so if the big one's go boom you still have some
Then your fighters must be bulky as hell, not to mention expensive to build. I'm going to guess most of the people boasting about how many large reactors they use are using sandbox mode to 'easy' design. I mean, why bother making your design effective when you can just add another 8 large reactors and build a wall of large thrusters, right? :P
2 large reactors?
Overkill?
Well, i had about 5 large reactors in my superfast fighter so, pretty formidable, those reactors might power any other attatchment, it may function as a mobile base, or a spacecraft carrier for land.
Overkill?
not uploading to workshop without sage's permission since they are based on his work.