安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題






If you're interested EctoSage, I'd be willing to upload them to the workshop (while providing credit, of course).
planets has arrived. Yay !!!!
yeah i did that, but i was also on the planet map which has gravity, and neither thing worked
agreed but you may ned just some small reactors around the rover so if the big one's go boom you still have some
Then your fighters must be bulky as hell, not to mention expensive to build. I'm going to guess most of the people boasting about how many large reactors they use are using sandbox mode to 'easy' design. I mean, why bother making your design effective when you can just add another 8 large reactors and build a wall of large thrusters, right? :P
2 large reactors?
Overkill?
Well, i had about 5 large reactors in my superfast fighter so, pretty formidable, those reactors might power any other attatchment, it may function as a mobile base, or a spacecraft carrier for land.
Overkill?
not uploading to workshop without sage's permission since they are based on his work.