安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Defensively to cut of access to hostile empires.
Agressively to cricumvent positions that would otherwise hidner access to a taget empire or to withhold their expected support of allies.
Economicly cut of systems we do not need and use up efficiency or to create better conditions for trade whatever that may entail.
Artisticly to make nice looking shapes.
others i did not think of ....
Point being, at least some of this could be estemations on when an AIs would use it to their advantage.
I am though completly unaware if just by comparing strength of empires, and identifying useless systems that would be enough to create a list of systems that should or should not be connected for the AI and if that would lead otherwise to problems i did not factor in.
I recommend this be applied. Increasing cost of the base structure to compensate for the lost intermediary step.
Thank you for restoring/maintaining this mod.