Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Defensively to cut of access to hostile empires.
Agressively to cricumvent positions that would otherwise hidner access to a taget empire or to withhold their expected support of allies.
Economicly cut of systems we do not need and use up efficiency or to create better conditions for trade whatever that may entail.
Artisticly to make nice looking shapes.
others i did not think of ....
Point being, at least some of this could be estemations on when an AIs would use it to their advantage.
I am though completly unaware if just by comparing strength of empires, and identifying useless systems that would be enough to create a list of systems that should or should not be connected for the AI and if that would lead otherwise to problems i did not factor in.
I recommend this be applied. Increasing cost of the base structure to compensate for the lost intermediary step.
Thank you for restoring/maintaining this mod.