Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
2 cameron know nothing about drug, tyler use him as scapegoat
Thanks for the first one.
As for the second question. If Cameron know nothing about the drug, why does Tyler say,
"when you finish this little errand he won't even be able to OFFER UP THE DEALER AS PART OF A PLEA..."
From Tyler's perspective, there is a possibility of Cameron offering the dealer as part of a plea. To do that, Cameron must at least know about his existence.
So my guess is it's one of a several options:
1. Cameron knew (was in contact with) this dealer.
2. Due to his power, Cameron can find this dealer and rat on him.
3. Tyler said it hypothetically. Like [even if he knew this dealer] he wouldn't be able to offer him as part of a plea...
4. Something else
What do you think?