安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
2 cameron know nothing about drug, tyler use him as scapegoat
Thanks for the first one.
As for the second question. If Cameron know nothing about the drug, why does Tyler say,
"when you finish this little errand he won't even be able to OFFER UP THE DEALER AS PART OF A PLEA..."
From Tyler's perspective, there is a possibility of Cameron offering the dealer as part of a plea. To do that, Cameron must at least know about his existence.
So my guess is it's one of a several options:
1. Cameron knew (was in contact with) this dealer.
2. Due to his power, Cameron can find this dealer and rat on him.
3. Tyler said it hypothetically. Like [even if he knew this dealer] he wouldn't be able to offer him as part of a plea...
4. Something else
What do you think?