Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
2 cameron know nothing about drug, tyler use him as scapegoat
Thanks for the first one.
As for the second question. If Cameron know nothing about the drug, why does Tyler say,
"when you finish this little errand he won't even be able to OFFER UP THE DEALER AS PART OF A PLEA..."
From Tyler's perspective, there is a possibility of Cameron offering the dealer as part of a plea. To do that, Cameron must at least know about his existence.
So my guess is it's one of a several options:
1. Cameron knew (was in contact with) this dealer.
2. Due to his power, Cameron can find this dealer and rat on him.
3. Tyler said it hypothetically. Like [even if he knew this dealer] he wouldn't be able to offer him as part of a plea...
4. Something else
What do you think?