Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
2 cameron know nothing about drug, tyler use him as scapegoat
Thanks for the first one.
As for the second question. If Cameron know nothing about the drug, why does Tyler say,
"when you finish this little errand he won't even be able to OFFER UP THE DEALER AS PART OF A PLEA..."
From Tyler's perspective, there is a possibility of Cameron offering the dealer as part of a plea. To do that, Cameron must at least know about his existence.
So my guess is it's one of a several options:
1. Cameron knew (was in contact with) this dealer.
2. Due to his power, Cameron can find this dealer and rat on him.
3. Tyler said it hypothetically. Like [even if he knew this dealer] he wouldn't be able to offer him as part of a plea...
4. Something else
What do you think?