安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I suspect the -20% penalty is being applied here due to a bug. Otherwise you just get +20% for aquatic and -20% overall, which just cancel eachother out. That has to be a bug, otherwise it's a terrible trade off.
Normally, an Aquatic species on a habitat loses an additional 20% Habitability - a normal 40% Habitability habitat would have only 20% for an Aquatic species (or 10% if they're Hydrocentric, as the negative effect is boosted by half). Flooding the habitat means that this penalty is waived, as well as that caused by the flooding itself.
So yes, flooding a habitat DOES improve Aquatic habitability, by either 20% or 30% (depending on whether the Aquatic species is the owner and has Hydrocentric or not).
What Hydrocentric does NOT do, I've noticed, is boost the Aquatic Habitability bonus on Ocean worlds by half.