Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
I suspect the -20% penalty is being applied here due to a bug. Otherwise you just get +20% for aquatic and -20% overall, which just cancel eachother out. That has to be a bug, otherwise it's a terrible trade off.
Normally, an Aquatic species on a habitat loses an additional 20% Habitability - a normal 40% Habitability habitat would have only 20% for an Aquatic species (or 10% if they're Hydrocentric, as the negative effect is boosted by half). Flooding the habitat means that this penalty is waived, as well as that caused by the flooding itself.
So yes, flooding a habitat DOES improve Aquatic habitability, by either 20% or 30% (depending on whether the Aquatic species is the owner and has Hydrocentric or not).
What Hydrocentric does NOT do, I've noticed, is boost the Aquatic Habitability bonus on Ocean worlds by half.