Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I suspect the -20% penalty is being applied here due to a bug. Otherwise you just get +20% for aquatic and -20% overall, which just cancel eachother out. That has to be a bug, otherwise it's a terrible trade off.
Normally, an Aquatic species on a habitat loses an additional 20% Habitability - a normal 40% Habitability habitat would have only 20% for an Aquatic species (or 10% if they're Hydrocentric, as the negative effect is boosted by half). Flooding the habitat means that this penalty is waived, as well as that caused by the flooding itself.
So yes, flooding a habitat DOES improve Aquatic habitability, by either 20% or 30% (depending on whether the Aquatic species is the owner and has Hydrocentric or not).
What Hydrocentric does NOT do, I've noticed, is boost the Aquatic Habitability bonus on Ocean worlds by half.