Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Mistress slots I will consider! It might be too powerful as I don't want it to override concubines but I'll keep it bouncing in my noggin
its very crusader kings to want this though so I'll think about what I can do to have better support of 'forbidden' paramours (sexuality, incestuous, criminals etc)
5 doesn't seem like something that would make sense unless you also have significant opinion penalties added on top. It would be another kind of scandal. ("Mistress has too much influence")
I do think it would be an interesting dynamic to toy around with, with the new roads to power expansion it could be fun to play as a character who seduces their way to power. I'm probably the last one who should say it but I'd like to play that whenever I have the time to implement it