安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Mistress slots I will consider! It might be too powerful as I don't want it to override concubines but I'll keep it bouncing in my noggin
its very crusader kings to want this though so I'll think about what I can do to have better support of 'forbidden' paramours (sexuality, incestuous, criminals etc)
5 doesn't seem like something that would make sense unless you also have significant opinion penalties added on top. It would be another kind of scandal. ("Mistress has too much influence")
I do think it would be an interesting dynamic to toy around with, with the new roads to power expansion it could be fun to play as a character who seduces their way to power. I'm probably the last one who should say it but I'd like to play that whenever I have the time to implement it