Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Mistress slots I will consider! It might be too powerful as I don't want it to override concubines but I'll keep it bouncing in my noggin
its very crusader kings to want this though so I'll think about what I can do to have better support of 'forbidden' paramours (sexuality, incestuous, criminals etc)
5 doesn't seem like something that would make sense unless you also have significant opinion penalties added on top. It would be another kind of scandal. ("Mistress has too much influence")
I do think it would be an interesting dynamic to toy around with, with the new roads to power expansion it could be fun to play as a character who seduces their way to power. I'm probably the last one who should say it but I'd like to play that whenever I have the time to implement it