安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I often see them form 2-4 packs when hunting a hare while they hunt alone when hunting something more dangerous like ibex ram/doe. This often results in my animals being downed by the ibex
Normally there is no need to specify in detail the number of animals in the packs for a particular predator kind, because the algorithm will automatically deduce the number of members in the pack to avoid injuries, ...unless there is a bug, but I have not managed to replicate your examples.
Fixed in 3.0.5.
I can not really add the feature you described, because setting X hunter for prey type Y can not work, because X depends on you hunter type (eg: 3 wolf can handle a bear, while 3 pigs can not. ..), however would it be interesting to add a parameter to force the minimum number of animals in the packs ?
Currently i imitate vanilla behavior when wild predator hunt to feed onself, by taking 3 variables to compute for prey and predator a score to determine targeting or not (base attack, fresh health state and body size).
So i propose to take into account also the average of the following levels of capacity (which are affected by removed or injured body part) to adjust the score :
What do you think about ?
And also my condolences for your semi crippled Warg ... xD
Perhaps if the calculated score drops below a threshold (considered useless as a hunter) a alert could be issued suggesting a peaceful retirement in deep freeze storage for that hunter.
I will look for your second suggestion.