Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
@ all subscribers Please have some patience cause my free time is almost zero lately. Will get back to you on this guys. Sorry
To be totally honest though in this mod stats were not picked in all cases with strictly historic criteria. In some cases personal judgement came into play so I dont reject the idea that some imbalances may exist..
From 6000 current subscribers and many more in the past I dont get many complaints conserning balancing but this does not mean that stat values are carved in stone and cannot be changed.
For the provinces I have no bonuses it is because I had no specific historic data and I didnt want to improvise or speculate.
For Asia minor i dont remember.. When I go to change the pella bonus will check this also.
P.S this mod is not stricktly historic but lets say historic inspired. It aims to a more strategic gameplay
I have one question about point 8 though. Do the bonuses get a bit crazy?... As in two armies will sit their duking it out for an overly long time or strange things happening due to an imbalance of bonuses?