Store Page
Opus Magnum
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews

Opus Magnum

Store Page
Opus Magnum >  Workshop > Stupid Snake's Workshop > GREEK FIRE
GREEK FIRE
Description Discussions0 Comments20 Change Notes
20 Comments
< >
Bambi 25 Aug, 2020 @ 7:25pm 
Now that I think about it, the theoretical minimum could be slightly less than 40 if the triplex bonds for all 6 products were made before attaching the water atoms.
Bambi 25 Aug, 2020 @ 7:01pm 
This is the best I could do for low-cycles: 790 / 43 / 178 [imgur.com]
Theoretical minimum is 40.
Psynixx 25 Sep, 2019 @ 10:06am 
going for speed: https://imgur.com/dAS7hAz
620/65/100
PentaPig 17 Sep, 2019 @ 3:10pm 
There is no reason to use track. 110/675/50 https://i.imgur.com/HobCjKa.gifv

This was way more difficult than I expected. There are a lot of promising configurations for calcification/ duplication that get very close to working.
[p%%h]StaleWhiteBread 16 Sep, 2019 @ 6:53pm 
I think I made the cheapest solution possible. 125/604/87

https://imgur.com/a/qtuioeM
Dizze 5 Sep, 2019 @ 10:21am 
I was finishing this and completely forgot that the input was of 2 air nucleus
https://i.imgur.com/H6Xvo1M.gif
Stupid Snake  [author] 4 Sep, 2019 @ 7:15pm 
@Alcator: Oh, I know. I was just describing the way it tends to fall out in my own designs--area and cost at the expense of time.
Alcator 4 Sep, 2019 @ 8:58am 
@Stupid Snake: That is actually natural - those criteria are working against each other. It's usually not possible to have both low cost and low cycles, or low area and low cycles.
To get "top percentile" in each chart, you need multiple different solutions for each puzzle.
Stupid Snake  [author] 4 Sep, 2019 @ 6:43am 
Love those solutions. Mahashma, I have the same problem. In most of the main game puzzles, my solutions hit the peak or better on the histograms for size and cost...and do way worse than the peak on cycles, lol
jefkin 3 Sep, 2019 @ 3:17pm 
330 / 128 / 88 https://imgur.com/a/3YoMQsl
Alcator 3 Sep, 2019 @ 9:08am 
My solution:
https://imgur.com/gallery/tI7ErEr
$:350/C:219/A:75
mahashma 3 Sep, 2019 @ 1:13am 
Because I couldn't leave it alone... https://imgur.com/a/o3Tnbop
370/209/93 and it likely has a lot of room for improvement; I tend to focus on size, so optimising for cycles is a new challenge.
mahashma 2 Sep, 2019 @ 9:19pm 
Smaller! Cheaper! Fast...errrr... maybe nosomuch faster
140/554/27 https://imgur.com/a/tmGE6BB
mahashma 2 Sep, 2019 @ 8:26pm 
260/299/38 https://imgur.com/a/XXen7QR :D
Stupid Snake  [author] 2 Sep, 2019 @ 6:48pm 
Alcator: Damn, that's fast. I want to see your solution.
vizthex 2 Sep, 2019 @ 11:25am 
@Alcator Where's the gif?!
Alcator 2 Sep, 2019 @ 8:46am 
Very nice puzzle, thank you!
$:350/C:219/A:75
vizthex 24 Aug, 2019 @ 1:08pm 
@Stupid Snake Idk, but unless someone makes it smaller I suppose so.
Stupid Snake  [author] 24 Aug, 2019 @ 12:48pm 
vizthez--Nice! I wonder if that's as compact as it can get?
vizthex 24 Aug, 2019 @ 8:16am 
Nice puzzle! I made a 320/348/50 solution, so it was smaller than yours :D https://imgur.com/OEbAj0m