Butiksside
Opus Magnum
Alt Diskussioner Skærmbilleder Illustrationer Broadcasts Videoer Værksted Nyheder Guider Anmeldelser

Opus Magnum

Butiksside
Opus Magnum >  Værksted > Stupid Snakes værksted > GREEK FIRE
GREEK FIRE
Beskrivelse Diskussioner0 Kommentarer20 Ændringsbemærkninger
20 kommentarer
< >
Bambi 25. aug. 2020 kl. 19:25 
Now that I think about it, the theoretical minimum could be slightly less than 40 if the triplex bonds for all 6 products were made before attaching the water atoms.
Bambi 25. aug. 2020 kl. 19:01 
This is the best I could do for low-cycles: 790 / 43 / 178 [imgur.com]
Theoretical minimum is 40.
Psynixx 25. sep. 2019 kl. 10:06 
going for speed: https://imgur.com/dAS7hAz
620/65/100
PentaPig 17. sep. 2019 kl. 15:10 
There is no reason to use track. 110/675/50 https://i.imgur.com/HobCjKa.gifv

This was way more difficult than I expected. There are a lot of promising configurations for calcification/ duplication that get very close to working.
[p%%h]StaleWhiteBread 16. sep. 2019 kl. 18:53 
I think I made the cheapest solution possible. 125/604/87

https://imgur.com/a/qtuioeM
Dizze 5. sep. 2019 kl. 10:21 
I was finishing this and completely forgot that the input was of 2 air nucleus
https://i.imgur.com/H6Xvo1M.gif
Stupid Snake  [ophavsmand] 4. sep. 2019 kl. 19:15 
@Alcator: Oh, I know. I was just describing the way it tends to fall out in my own designs--area and cost at the expense of time.
Alcator 4. sep. 2019 kl. 8:58 
@Stupid Snake: That is actually natural - those criteria are working against each other. It's usually not possible to have both low cost and low cycles, or low area and low cycles.
To get "top percentile" in each chart, you need multiple different solutions for each puzzle.
Stupid Snake  [ophavsmand] 4. sep. 2019 kl. 6:43 
Love those solutions. Mahashma, I have the same problem. In most of the main game puzzles, my solutions hit the peak or better on the histograms for size and cost...and do way worse than the peak on cycles, lol
jefkin 3. sep. 2019 kl. 15:17 
330 / 128 / 88 https://imgur.com/a/3YoMQsl
Alcator 3. sep. 2019 kl. 9:08 
My solution:
https://imgur.com/gallery/tI7ErEr
$:350/C:219/A:75
mahashma 3. sep. 2019 kl. 1:13 
Because I couldn't leave it alone... https://imgur.com/a/o3Tnbop
370/209/93 and it likely has a lot of room for improvement; I tend to focus on size, so optimising for cycles is a new challenge.
mahashma 2. sep. 2019 kl. 21:19 
Smaller! Cheaper! Fast...errrr... maybe nosomuch faster
140/554/27 https://imgur.com/a/tmGE6BB
mahashma 2. sep. 2019 kl. 20:26 
260/299/38 https://imgur.com/a/XXen7QR :D
Stupid Snake  [ophavsmand] 2. sep. 2019 kl. 18:48 
Alcator: Damn, that's fast. I want to see your solution.
vizthex 2. sep. 2019 kl. 11:25 
@Alcator Where's the gif?!
Alcator 2. sep. 2019 kl. 8:46 
Very nice puzzle, thank you!
$:350/C:219/A:75
vizthex 24. aug. 2019 kl. 13:08 
@Stupid Snake Idk, but unless someone makes it smaller I suppose so.
Stupid Snake  [ophavsmand] 24. aug. 2019 kl. 12:48 
vizthez--Nice! I wonder if that's as compact as it can get?
vizthex 24. aug. 2019 kl. 8:16 
Nice puzzle! I made a 320/348/50 solution, so it was smaller than yours :D https://imgur.com/OEbAj0m