Đánh giá gần đây bởi smegs

This game lists itself as Single Player, but there's really nothing to do Single-Player. I found it generally unintuitive.

It is fairly enjoyable, but only for a short period of time. You quickly feel like you've done all that you can do.

Counter-Strike: Source brought original Counter-Strike's terrific mechanics forward into a new graphical generation. All things done were improvements without negatively impacting core gameplay.

This game doesn't really bring anything new but some plot elements. I'm still recommending it, because it still has all of the terrific X3 elements, but X3: Terran Conflict has the same mechanics with more of a fleshed-out story.

The controls and combat and really unreliable and the game just doesn't play well. What's with all of the DLC? This game is just a giant joke/gimmick.

I'm downvoting this on principle. An industry making a documentary about its own industry is very "meta", and meta is very in right now, but it's masturbatory and substanceless. Nobody is learning anything worthwhile out of this and it doesn't give anything close to a meaningful or objective perspective.

Prince of Persia -like hack and slash action game with nice graphics and solid combat. Controls are a little clumsy, but not too bad.

Mechanically, this game is really well developed. But the plot is shallow and pointless - there's no incentive to play except to mindlessly kill things in a game of chess.

I like space games, and I like Star Trek. This game has no plot, no real exploration; it's just a ship management sim. It feels like work - scratch that, I think I like work more.

If you're from this generation of games, and you don't really see the appeal of MineCraft's box graphics, this is the game for you. It lets you do everything you wish you could have done in a Mario-type game. You get to really own the environment.