3
已評論
產品
2107
帳戶內
產品

Idle Marsupial 最近的評論

目前顯示第 1-3 項,共 3 項
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 6.0 小時
A nice little time sink. A little short, but worth the $5 I spent. The visuals are quite beautiful, I found no glitches, and it some of the stages did give me a small bit of challenge. I'd love to see more content, a sequel, or more games that are similar.
張貼於 2018 年 4 月 5 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 106.8 小時 (評論時已進行 105.6 小時)
One of the best games I've played in a long time, I'm so excited to play the second!
張貼於 2016 年 9 月 18 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
14 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 23.7 小時 (評論時已進行 18.1 小時)
I'm an avid VN player that is pretty easily pleased in terms of content. I got this hoping to enjoy it as much as I did Huniepop, and I really didn't.

The puzzle aspect is simultaneously too easy and too hard; the fact that you have no limitation on where you can move the pieces makes it too easy to score, but the low amount of turns coupled with the sometimes rather high score requirements makes it difficult. It became a chore really quickly.

The VN side was lackluster as well. The characters seemed rather unrealistic, the scenes themselves always seemed rushed or forced, and the CG's didn't always match the scene in question. I think the part that annoys me most, is that I looked up "Pure Girl" and "Innocent Girl" (the games of which the characters are from), and found out that they were full length VN's, with actual effort put into them, and so on. This just seems like the developers looked at Huniepop, thought "Hmm, this is popular, we can make a quick buck from this!" and dissected two of their own games to do so. Without the puzzle game, this would be ridiculously short.

Edit: Also would like to add in that my play time was inflated by idling a lot, so I didn't actually play however many hours it claims.
張貼於 2016 年 7 月 18 日。 最後編輯於 2016 年 7 月 18 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前顯示第 1-3 項,共 3 項