Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Let's be frank: Steam makes finding games accessible. As such, we don't need one-glance scores and throw-away one liners to make a decision. A more holistic approach to reviewing games means that we can get a better feel for the game. Regardless of how important saving dollar bills is, the real benefit of a "thick and hearty review" (as you describe it) is to save our time from playing a game which wasn't ever going to suit us.
I don't mind reading a bit more, because it often pays off later. There is not a lot of nuance in reviews such as: "4/5 good graphics, 2/5 game length." Don't these other reviewers know that most games show the graphics in screenshots, and that Steam displays players' played-time? Useless reviews..
*followed*