Originally posted by フハイ:

Lol no, if zombies are typical zombies from twd then the apocalypse won't even happen.

But TWD zombies don't follow laws of phyiscs. They just seem to infinitely spawn in an area when situations are bad and in seemlingly open and clear areas where you could hear them coming from miles away they seem to sneak up on people no problem. We'd be fucked.

They split up the fanbase so steam players and windows 10 players are seperated. Regardless if it's good or bad that alone should be enough reason to avoid it on PC. PC is the future and yet they continue to treat CoD on pc like crap. Probably because it's not welcome here tho, which it isn't.

Me and my twin were playing Gears of War 3 online back in the day and well it was a stompfest with the enemy team wrecking ours. We had just our 1 life each while the enemy team had something like 13 total. 13 fricken lives in a tactical game. So we hid to avoid getting swarmed, in a cut off part of the map, that was somewhat of a hole with only one way in.


Their team desperate to find the last members and confident in their victory decided to split up, and we first took out 2 of them no problem soon as they stumbling upon us. We then took out another nearby guy together and fell back into our safe spot. Confident in their numbers their less intelligent teammates rushed us like lemmings using up their entire respawn pool and then some, leaving only 2 members left on their last life. Low on ammo we slowly outplayed them until only 1 remained and he shortly fell due to teamwork.











There was another time I was playing with my twin, this time in tf2, back in the pub days. Him and me don't believe in pub stomping so we generally play on opposite teams as it wouldn't be fair, but his teammates got really mad that I had roughly a 20+ killstreak at all times, dominating them specifically because they were the best people. They decided to get another friend on and tried to triple team me, if I was going soldier they'd go soldier and medic, if I was going demo, they'd go demo and medic.



After I caught on I had my twin swap teams, and every time they came near our base either they died or I got one of them no problem. We beautifully countered every uber by using kritz against quicfix, stock against krtiz, and they couldn't get a single kill all game on either me or my medic after that. I don't normally take games seriously but when people invite their friends just to triple team me I make sure they're having lots of fun.





Imo, speaking of, I pracitically had this happen every other day on tf2 pubs. Sometimes against cheaters, sometimes against regular pubscrubs who think they're too good for comp. Some scrubs can't play without a friend/pocket medic up his ass fulltime and it's nice to just not let them squeeze out a crushing victory but instead give it to them since they like to stack teams every time they're losing.

Your ex-friend was a dick, but why come here for validation? If you think you did the right thing that should be good enough for you.

Dark Souls left me disappointed after all the hype.

I would say either Dark Souls 2 or Demon's souls are probably the best games to start with. Dark Souls for all it's glory left me confused as the beginning as to where I was supposed to go after getting out of the starting area, and since it feels most tight in the series playing it can lead to being disappointed by the sequels. Dark Souls 2 doesn't have a lack of direction problem but adds a few problems of it's own.



Demon's Souls is the most flawed and least balanced in the game series but in my opinion the best. It's the game design flaws that feel rewarding at times when you figure them out. Things later fixed in the series that I enjoyed the most about it.



Not sure about Dark Souls 3 I haven't played it or Bloodbourne.

I'm gonna say no, even though he went a little far by bringing up that one comment over and over again.

I would either be lenient for rule 2, edit it, or remove it. Doesn't seem like that big of an offense and tbh it's hard not to contribute to derailing a thread depending on the discussion taking place there. Like, wouldn't be a big deal in my opinion if someone derailed or helped derail a thread occasionally so long as it's not every other thread.

Originally posted by Pigeonbee:

Originally posted by ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:

Pyrofish wasn't liked because of how much hate she brought and how much people hated her for it

Really it isn't about circlejerking

you mean a few people had grudges and spread some wishy-washy rumours and made the new members not like her because

"she big dumb meanie who made soilder is op thread"
or
"she big dumb meanie for linking me to wiki"

Actually I thought I'd like Pyrofish because I like people who make soldier is op threads usually. They're fun to read and a lot of people do bring up interesting points with some merits. You shouldn't necessarily assume that any negativity she's earned from new members solely lies on the actions of others and not herself. Joking or not pyrofish comes off as extremely hostile, that's more than likely what turns new members away from liking her.

Originally posted by The Extreme Potato:

Originally posted by Littlefoot:

I've yet to see anyone than her act like a bitch towards someone who's friend commited suicide.

It was a Joke[www.google.co.uk]. Do you seriously think she meant that? If you do then you really need to learn when people mean what they say and when they don't...

I hate hearing this thin arguement whenever reading through ban appeals or excuses. Nothing feels more lazy than playing off every action and word they've done as "I was joking". It's not to say a sense of humour shouldn't be allowed but you can't expect every member or moderator to intimately know the member in question and know that when they tell someone to fuck themselves that they're just joking. If they can't make their joke or sarcasm more obvious then maybe they should try to tone down the joke or avoid sensitive subjects so it can't be interupted so badly. None of this would have happened were they capable of either of those things.

Given pyrofish's posts, what little I saw before the ban anyways, I can say the special conditions aren't a bad idea honestly. You never mentioned what the new conditions are though.