Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I have it and have played it a good bit. It is showing its age now though, so I wanted to try something a bit more modern. I will probably be disappointed in all honesty haha.
You are missing out on Pharaoh. As a historical title it is one of the best as an overall game. Performance is great, features are great, excellent graphics, and it is one of the most realistic feeling vanilla games they have made. They also did well with the unit characteristics variety considering the lack of different unit types for the period.
The hate over it is really just because it isn't Medieval 3 and people see it to be small in scope. People also forget the CA main team is and has been working on a BIG title for a while now. Pharaoh is kinda an in between game. You should give it a shot.