安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
3 
举报此帖
This part is due to how the game renders its graphics. It's a problem, and the very first thing I commented on in these forums. I've requested a change to fix it.
In a nutshell, all of the graphics are rendered at about 1000 x 1000, with no real antialiasing. Then the "vector monitor" filter is applied to it, which does a little antialiasing to the hard stairstepping of the input frame just as a natural part of how the filter works. Because the input frame is basically nothing but blocky pixels, the final frame after the filter still looks blocky.
The reason it looks sharp and "like a real raster display" on the laptop is because of the smaller screen. You can get the same exact effect simply by playing the game in windowed mode and shrinking the window down. Obviously this should NOT be the case, and it wouldn't be, if the game was being rendered at your display's native resolution rather than ~1000 x ~1000 internally AND the render was using anti-aliasing.
I don't think it's a very tall ask. MAME has been doing it better for many years.