Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Still... i can't pay if they don't do a Native Linux version
What d'you mean? Is it really so? Elaborate? Or did you just forget /s ?
If this was a "AAAA" publisher creation, I could understand the frustration, however...
Linux users are 2% of the steam userbase, if a dev, ESPECIALLY an indie dev, has a choice to spend time and resources on making a better game overall rather than having a linux native version, I'd happily take a better game I can run via proton - As long as they do not go out of their way to screw linux users - especially considering some linux native versions of games age incredibly poorly and suffer from issues relating to outdated libs and poor performance on later hardware (Witcher 2 being the prime example I had experience with).
And before somebody accuses me of being an ms win fanboy:
OS: Nobara Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) x86_64
Kernel: Linux 6.11.7-201.fsync.fc40.x86_64
So cut the people some slack and stop being preachy. And if you do not find that convincing then just don't get the game, I'm having a chill-af experience here (with, again, no issues, running on latest stable steam proton) so it's your loss, I suppose.