Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
Still... i can't pay if they don't do a Native Linux version
What d'you mean? Is it really so? Elaborate? Or did you just forget /s ?
If this was a "AAAA" publisher creation, I could understand the frustration, however...
Linux users are 2% of the steam userbase, if a dev, ESPECIALLY an indie dev, has a choice to spend time and resources on making a better game overall rather than having a linux native version, I'd happily take a better game I can run via proton - As long as they do not go out of their way to screw linux users - especially considering some linux native versions of games age incredibly poorly and suffer from issues relating to outdated libs and poor performance on later hardware (Witcher 2 being the prime example I had experience with).
And before somebody accuses me of being an ms win fanboy:
OS: Nobara Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) x86_64
Kernel: Linux 6.11.7-201.fsync.fc40.x86_64
So cut the people some slack and stop being preachy. And if you do not find that convincing then just don't get the game, I'm having a chill-af experience here (with, again, no issues, running on latest stable steam proton) so it's your loss, I suppose.