Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Still... i can't pay if they don't do a Native Linux version
What d'you mean? Is it really so? Elaborate? Or did you just forget /s ?
If this was a "AAAA" publisher creation, I could understand the frustration, however...
Linux users are 2% of the steam userbase, if a dev, ESPECIALLY an indie dev, has a choice to spend time and resources on making a better game overall rather than having a linux native version, I'd happily take a better game I can run via proton - As long as they do not go out of their way to screw linux users - especially considering some linux native versions of games age incredibly poorly and suffer from issues relating to outdated libs and poor performance on later hardware (Witcher 2 being the prime example I had experience with).
And before somebody accuses me of being an ms win fanboy:
OS: Nobara Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) x86_64
Kernel: Linux 6.11.7-201.fsync.fc40.x86_64
So cut the people some slack and stop being preachy. And if you do not find that convincing then just don't get the game, I'm having a chill-af experience here (with, again, no issues, running on latest stable steam proton) so it's your loss, I suppose.