安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
On the whole, though, the game is entertaining, definitely satisfies the dollars-per-hours-played requirement i have.
Just skip those cutscenes.
The sad thing is that it's ONLY the faces, everything else looks solid to servicable...except maybe hands which kind of look a bit...off.
But I've always been a graphical style>graphical fidelity guy so make of that what you will.
And a 300 million budget game with a dev size of almost 200.
While solasta Kickstarter raised 250 thousand dollars and about 20 people. Even the 10 year difference, it's apples and oranges for the game development
and NOBODY compared the games in that sense. Strawman. I merely stated that T.A. did not follow the TES blueprint in the Dungeon Maker, thus leaving modders unable to modify faces, clothes, weapons, armor etc...in appearance.
That topic stopped being talked about multiple posts ago. You were responding to the guy who said he thinks solasta faces are better than skyrims, to which you said Skyrim was 10 years old. Has nothing to do with the creation kit. Keep up