安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
As a game creation platform, GameCraft never had a chance. Thats just how it is. The supposed Robocraft Lite wouldn't have changed anything. Plenty of other platforms with similar goals out there, except they offer much more than GameCraft. They offer more for the player, or provide more robustness for developers. Not going to deny the uniqueness of GameCraft's approach, but just like CardLife, this is another one of FreeJam's failed experements. Even in the long run, this GameCraft wouldn't have made back any significant sales. It already sold very poorly, even moreso when considering the fact that a large portion of the player base already got this game for free when it was still called RobocraftX.