安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
As a game creation platform, GameCraft never had a chance. Thats just how it is. The supposed Robocraft Lite wouldn't have changed anything. Plenty of other platforms with similar goals out there, except they offer much more than GameCraft. They offer more for the player, or provide more robustness for developers. Not going to deny the uniqueness of GameCraft's approach, but just like CardLife, this is another one of FreeJam's failed experements. Even in the long run, this GameCraft wouldn't have made back any significant sales. It already sold very poorly, even moreso when considering the fact that a large portion of the player base already got this game for free when it was still called RobocraftX.