安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
The in game explanation for this is that a unit of silver or gold refers to a tenth as much material as there is in, say a single unit of wood or steel. The reason for this mechanic is to allow for detail in trading without introducing a smaller unit currency to explain decimals. (ie. 100 cents equals a dollar, 100 pence = a pound)
As an example of "detail in trading", if an item 'X' is worth between 5 > X > 15 silver then it would equal 1 without the scaling by 10. This means 100 drugs currently worth 6 silver each would be just as valuable as 100 drugs currently worth 14 silver each, which would remove some of the depth from the different ways of making money through the mass production of low value items.
Just realised how much of a tangent I went on to a simple question. Sorry if this seems like I was being rude or something. ┐(‘~`;)┌
P.S If you hover over the ingredient silver or gold in a bill which has multiple options for material. (such as a sculpture at an art bench) It says they are small volume ingredients and explains the in game reason.
P.P.S Jade isn't a small volume ingredient.