Store Page
Stellaris
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews

Stellaris

Store Page
Stellaris >  Workshop > walshicus's Workshop > Star Trek: New Civilisations > Discussions
Star Trek: New Civilisations
Description Discussions394 Comments7264 Change Notes
gregory.knapp 30 May @ 6:57am
Starship Retirement
I was expecting a warning about older style starships being decommissioned in favor of newer ones.

But when the Miranda-Class was researched to replace the NX-Class, nothing happened.

When you get this message, I hope you will have someone to spare to fix the problem.
< >
Showing 1-12 of 12 comments
walshicus  [developer] 30 May @ 11:50am 
Yes, it's currently not working due to a Stellaris 4.0 bug/change. I need to think of a good way around it without impacting performance.
#1
gregory.knapp 4 Jun @ 5:06am 
Originally posted by walshicus:
Yes, it's currently not working due to a Stellaris 4.0 bug/change. I need to think of a good way around it without impacting performance.
Well, I hope that it won't take you too long to find a way.

I'd hate for this wait to be no better than Universe Sandbox.
#2
gregory.knapp 21 Jun @ 4:36am 
Tell me you managed to fix the automated starship retirement feature by now.
#3
gregory.knapp 22 Sep @ 8:15am 
Is anyone going to do something about the Klingon ship retirement feature?

With the new ship classes already researched, the older ones should be retired automatically.

What's wrong with this picture?
#4
walshicus  [developer] 23 Sep @ 11:56am 
As I say, it requires a fix to how Stellaris can read scripted modifiers values from ships in design scope, after PDS added an intermediary growth_stage scope.
#5
gregory.knapp 25 Sep @ 4:32am 
Originally posted by walshicus:
As I say, it requires a fix to how Stellaris can read scripted modifiers values from ships in design scope, after PDS added an intermediary growth_stage scope.
Then I hope you're still working on it, and that it'll be ready for full release in the next update.
#6
walshicus  [developer] 25 Sep @ 9:37am 
I'm not working on it, I'm waiting for a fix from PDS.
#7
gregory.knapp 26 Sep @ 5:23am 
Originally posted by walshicus:
I'm not working on it, I'm waiting for a fix from PDS.
Well, I hope it arrives sooner rather than later.
#8
frozzeninwi 1 Oct @ 11:14am 
Originally posted by gregory.knapp:
Originally posted by walshicus:
I'm not working on it, I'm waiting for a fix from PDS.
Well, I hope it arrives sooner rather than later.
thanks and glad your aware of it, hopefully PDS fixes thier stuff! And thanks for gmaking such an amazing MOD!!!!!
#9
Wumpus 15 Oct @ 12:07am 
Originally posted by gregory.knapp:
Originally posted by walshicus:
I'm not working on it, I'm waiting for a fix from PDS.
Well, I hope it arrives sooner rather than later.

I hope your prepared for a long wait.
#10
gregory.knapp 15 Oct @ 4:48am 
Originally posted by Wumpus:
Originally posted by gregory.knapp:
Well, I hope it arrives sooner rather than later.

I hope your prepared for a long wait.
What do you mean by that?
#11
Wumpus 15 Oct @ 8:48am 
Originally posted by gregory.knapp:
Originally posted by Wumpus:

I hope your prepared for a long wait.
What do you mean by that?


Paradox in general is very slow to fix bugs. There are still some around from 1.0 and this may be one of them. I recall this bug being around in the mod for a very long time at this point. Theres not much if anything Walshicus can do about it either. It's engine level from what I know.
#12
< >
Showing 1-12 of 12 comments
Per page: 1530 50