安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Thanks for the reports, a fix will be included in the next mod update coming after the 1.18 release.
I'm assuming you're talking about the "Leading Own Soldiers" advantage modifier. I'll look at adding an option to tweak the value, but keep in mind that the only aspect of advantage that really matters is the advantage difference between two armies. With the other changes in this mod, this acts as less of a bonus and more of a debuff to armies not being led by their owner.
So your +15 advantage for example remains only a +5 relative advantage bonus against other armies with a ruler-leader. You're being pressured by the mod to lead armies with your ruler (as illustrated by you consistently placing your player in command), because without doing so you'll be at a -10 disadvantage against other armies being led by their owner unless you have someone who is both close enough to lead your armies and good enough to overcome the non-army-owner disadvantage.
This is very interesting.
Not sure though.