安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










Thanks for the reports, a fix will be included in the next mod update coming after the 1.18 release.
I'm assuming you're talking about the "Leading Own Soldiers" advantage modifier. I'll look at adding an option to tweak the value, but keep in mind that the only aspect of advantage that really matters is the advantage difference between two armies. With the other changes in this mod, this acts as less of a bonus and more of a debuff to armies not being led by their owner.
So your +15 advantage for example remains only a +5 relative advantage bonus against other armies with a ruler-leader. You're being pressured by the mod to lead armies with your ruler (as illustrated by you consistently placing your player in command), because without doing so you'll be at a -10 disadvantage against other armies being led by their owner unless you have someone who is both close enough to lead your armies and good enough to overcome the non-army-owner disadvantage.
This is very interesting.
Not sure though.