安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題










so unless you have sources of your own i'm going to assume everything that i think is correct in my mod, is actually correct to the most reasonable degree, until proven otherwise
much of the data collected for the mod is from online sources that are readily available, very little is from western books on the topic, and a significant portion of the research comes from russian books and manuals, alongside first/secondhand accounts and reasonable extrapolation in the absence of data
furthermore, I'm not the only person who's done research on this, so the mods data (especially subsurface) is carried on the back of valoda's exceptional work
this doesn't actually deter people from using gathered information to contest my data, i appreciate it when someone corrects me, but usually it ends up being someone doubtful soviet equipment actually worked and the USSR apparently lied about everything on documents they never released
it's random chance, so perhaps you are simply getting lucky/unlucky