安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










so unless you have sources of your own i'm going to assume everything that i think is correct in my mod, is actually correct to the most reasonable degree, until proven otherwise
much of the data collected for the mod is from online sources that are readily available, very little is from western books on the topic, and a significant portion of the research comes from russian books and manuals, alongside first/secondhand accounts and reasonable extrapolation in the absence of data
furthermore, I'm not the only person who's done research on this, so the mods data (especially subsurface) is carried on the back of valoda's exceptional work
this doesn't actually deter people from using gathered information to contest my data, i appreciate it when someone corrects me, but usually it ends up being someone doubtful soviet equipment actually worked and the USSR apparently lied about everything on documents they never released
it's random chance, so perhaps you are simply getting lucky/unlucky