Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
(very cool character, I think it's fun)
If I were to give an actual criticism. These characters are very high powered. I don't think much of the workshop that have decent quality behind them can't stand up to these guys.
Mudkip has the range, and the speed to be ridiculously oppressive and gimping with Mudkip is very easy.
I tried Gallantmon recently too, who has insane space control, with a beam that can threaten you off of one move is a bit much. Thought I'd say Gallantmon is better design wise since being combo food AND a big target is pretty darning in RoA.
Overall,
I'd say to go for an approach that matches more with the power of the Base RoA cast.
Thank you! Mudkip actually does have enough to get 5 stars, he mostly just doesn't have it due to dislike-bombing. Same can be said for Dr. Eggman (who otherwise would have 5 stars by now), and other characters being rated lower than they should for the same reason. Give the characters a vote and help counter it if you'd like; it'd be much appreciated!
Thank you, glad you like him!
Possibly your best work