Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
(very cool character, I think it's fun)
If I were to give an actual criticism. These characters are very high powered. I don't think much of the workshop that have decent quality behind them can't stand up to these guys.
Mudkip has the range, and the speed to be ridiculously oppressive and gimping with Mudkip is very easy.
I tried Gallantmon recently too, who has insane space control, with a beam that can threaten you off of one move is a bit much. Thought I'd say Gallantmon is better design wise since being combo food AND a big target is pretty darning in RoA.
Overall,
I'd say to go for an approach that matches more with the power of the Base RoA cast.
Thank you! Mudkip actually does have enough to get 5 stars, he mostly just doesn't have it due to dislike-bombing. Same can be said for Dr. Eggman (who otherwise would have 5 stars by now), and other characters being rated lower than they should for the same reason. Give the characters a vote and help counter it if you'd like; it'd be much appreciated!
Thank you, glad you like him!
Possibly your best work