Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
What I intended to convey was that the vanilla ascension perk, eternal vigilance, does not support your mod. One of the things that this perk does is automatically build vanilla defense platforms 1 per 6 months on all stations up to half of it's capacity. It only allows base game defense platforms and not defense stations or fortresses.
So I guess I was informing you of one thing and made a suggestion in the other. I've also linked the original mod that allowed persistent defense platforms that showed what I was suggesting as a feature.
Sorry for the confusion and thank you for the response.
Could you consider adding in a feature or a sub mod that prevents stations like the defense fortress from being destroyed? As in they get deactivated from battle but start repairing once it's over.
Your custom defense platforms added by the mod are not supported by eternal vigilence, plus it's not to not have to manually rebuild and queue them up after battles.
https://gtm.steamproxy.vip/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2501114149&searchtext=defense+platform
I'm never sure how to make so much alloy for ship maintenance.
Pretty much. But the bigger issue is that they are trying to censor/get rid of NSFW games while ignoring the ESRB ratings, ratings that were made for the sole purpose of helping parents decide what to get and not to get for their kids.
Maybe they think it's "not suitable for women" or something and got sand into their vaginas about it
This is a deep rabbit hole that has been digging for the past 2-3 weeks.
Would love what the copyright issue is supposed to be.
And on whose behalf the reporting was