安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題






The ai fully use all changes made the same as the player.
but i doubt anything major. ony edits arrows n their damage
- i went for the climate ideal- but the bitch is i cant make it so persian units basicly cant shoot bows in the west, and the west get fucked in the east lol
-- some units have the efects slightly diferent becouse of bow type. as i heavility edited he bows to reflect the full onslaught they bring. to the time era.
i find they really fuck you up and make you go after the archers. and thats really, what you should be doing in a battle v the archer nations.
wasent trying to mock you or anything, just saying it pisses me off too!
I mean, yes, there's something to be said for realism, and I don't disagree with your reasoning nor your intentions there and have plenty of background likewise. However, this is also a game, and from someone who spent multiple comments complaining about how overpowered javelins were I perhaps (apparently incorrectly) expected some consideration of game balancing, even if it maybe needed to be a little inventive (as this rather nice mod has been), rather than hiding behind the shield of realism while deathly critical arrows fly at you. (Oh ho, mod wit.)
So I hope you'll take these compliments along with the little bit of criticisms in kind.
Ah, yes, "condescension." We know thee well.