商店頁面
Space Engineers
全部 討論區 螢幕擷圖 藝術作品 實況直播 影片 工作坊 新聞 指南 評論

Space Engineers

商店頁面
Space Engineers >  工作坊 > Eikester 的工作坊 > (DX11) XL Thruster - Vanilla Style
(DX11) XL Thruster - Vanilla Style
介紹 討論區0 留言22 更新註記
22 則留言
< >
Hage Maoh 2019 年 9 月 23 日 下午 11:32 
May I add these blocks to a tiered mod for my dedicated server? Of course, I will give credit and link to the original mod in the description.
Ordep 2017 年 11 月 15 日 上午 4:28 
hey does it have the new textures?
Comedy 2016 年 12 月 3 日 下午 5:46 
Perfect for my Builds! All of them! Subscription for Life, and a Like to go with it!
andbruu 2016 年 4 月 30 日 下午 10:01 
Great thanks
andbruu 2016 年 4 月 27 日 下午 1:06 
@Eikester
Could you update the dampener factor? It is currently 10 while the vanilla thrusters have dropped to 1.
Engi 2016 年 4 月 21 日 下午 8:02 
Would you please update this to new thruster standards? damper factor 1 instead of 10.
Eikester  [作者] 2015 年 10 月 4 日 上午 6:42 
updated Force Magnitude and Power usage
KitsuneKas 2015 年 9 月 12 日 下午 4:04 
Needs to be updated with the new thruster multipliers.
hhaddow 2015 年 8 月 27 日 上午 12:17 
Could you make a version for capital class ships (perhaps 6*6*12) or supercapital class (12*12*24)
Also could you do 2*3*4 equivilents (i.e 6*9*12, 12*18*48, 24*36*96)
Whaddageek 2015 年 8 月 15 日 下午 8:05 
Any chance of a thrust increase due to the new patch?
SievertChaser 2015 年 6 月 12 日 下午 3:31 
Hey, I wonder - maybe the 2x3 shape is why Large thrusters sometimes explode for no reason?
⑨-Ball 2015 年 6 月 10 日 上午 1:22 
Everyone who is tired of the standard 2x3 model likes Eik!
ChozoSR388 2015 年 6 月 4 日 下午 2:25 
Thanks for this, Eikester!

@Crafter-Of-Mines213 [NL] Ever heard of this is bigger than the large thruster? Everyone has a large thruster, now there's the XL (eXtra Large) Thruster! It's pretty awesome, too!
Starbuckminsterfullerton 2015 年 5 月 14 日 下午 2:17 
Thank you, I have wanted this for so long. NEEDS to be stock.
Arturius1967 2015 年 5 月 12 日 上午 5:54 
Could you make 3x3x4 version please ? Basically this means the base only 1 cube thick.
Thanks in advance.
LordChicken 2015 年 5 月 10 日 下午 4:00 
I started something like this a while ago but never finished it. Was working on making a 2X and 3X version of the large and small thrusters for both small and large ships.
Eikester  [作者] 2015 年 5 月 10 日 下午 12:05 
@Crafter-Of-Mines213 [NL] what do you mean?
Sturg 2015 年 5 月 9 日 下午 1:31 
Ever heard of the large thruster. Its prety awsome
Death Master Auditor 2015 年 5 月 7 日 下午 1:20 
Thank you, I've been needing this (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧
[UESC] Abatos 2015 年 5 月 7 日 上午 7:24 
Ask and i shall receive, thanks Eikester. :)
CptTwinkie 2015 年 5 月 7 日 上午 1:14 
Is there any chance you'll do an armor version of this?
andbruu 2015 年 5 月 6 日 下午 12:27 
Nice to see a larger engine in the vanilla style. Some observations regarding balance, compared to the large/large thruster.
Its rear profile is 50% larger, matching the increase in force. Its power requirement is 178 MW/kN, some 30-40% more effective (large/large has 270 MW/kN). Its volume is more than double that of the large/large. So it matches rear-profile per force, it is more effective, but also more bulky. I would say its balanced then.
However, I would like that it had a better force-to-profile reatio, and was less effective, while keeping its inflated bulk. Large ships struggle with having enough thrust, with rear space being the major limiting factor to aliviate the problem. With the same force-to-profile ratio, this thruster does not help in that regard.
This is only my take on design, and I think that this thruster strikes a better balance than many thrusters on the workshop.
NB: I dont use grav-drives, so I am always interested in balanced thrusters.