Store Page
SpaceEngine
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews

SpaceEngine

Store Page
SpaceEngine >  Workshop > mystic's Workshop > Mystic's Exoplanet Revamp
Mystic's Exoplanet Revamp
Description Discussions1 Comments47 Change Notes
47 Comments
< >
mystic  [author] 14 Oct @ 6:03pm 
👀
Three 14 Oct @ 5:30pm 
also a 55 cnc g, yea there are some new planets check exoplanet eu and wikipedia
mystic  [author] 14 Oct @ 5:23pm 
It has new planets?
Three 14 Oct @ 5:12pm 
oops i meant confirmed
Three 14 Oct @ 5:10pm 
suggestion: 55 cancri B's new candidate planets
luxiohermes 28 Sep @ 9:09pm 
Ahh i see, but i personally prefer gas planets to also have procedural textures, I think it will look more natural and beautiful in game. :steamthumbsup:
mystic  [author] 21 Sep @ 2:06am 
I just released a new update on this mod which adds procedural surface textures to the rocky planets which previously had image textures, and in order for the surfaces to show up correctly, you need Sp_ce's Palettes Reimagined
mystic  [author] 15 Sep @ 1:46pm 
I could probably remove the textures for the terrestrial planets, because the original idea with this mod was that only gas giants should have textures, but I've ended up giving some terrestrial planets some textures
luxiohermes 15 Sep @ 6:14am 
the ones with custom textures dont look to great, it would be better to stick with the procedural textures like before or just make it simillar to
the artist rendition...
mystic  [author] 4 Sep @ 4:35am 
It's alg
Three 4 Sep @ 3:55am 
yup, i forgot about them my bad
mystic  [author] 2 Sep @ 2:32pm 
Oh and also the fictional moons and hypothetical Io-analog moons don't have their discovery date or method on them bc they're (Io-analog moons) are unknown
mystic  [author] 2 Sep @ 2:31pm 
@animationfan13 I just checked my mod now, and the objects that didn't have their discovery date and methods was the stars, J1407b, and some unknown planets. Other than that, all of the object have their correct discovery date and method on them
mystic  [author] 2 Sep @ 1:45pm 
All of them? Istg the majority of them have their discovery date and method on them, are you sure your SE isn't bugged or anything?
Three 2 Sep @ 12:14pm 
pretty much all of them lol
mystic  [author] 2 Sep @ 4:51am 
Which ones?
Three 1 Sep @ 7:10pm 
you could probably add the discovery dates and methods to the exoplanets u added
abidin1618 29 Aug @ 7:54am 
sure
mystic  [author] 29 Aug @ 4:11am 
Update: I'm now doing stellar revamps/additions in this mod too (Ik it isn't exoplanet related, but I felt like adding stars (even if they don't have exoplanets) which don't exist yet in SE). What do you guys think? So far I've only added R136a2, R136a3, and WD 1856+534
abidin1618 27 Aug @ 8:09am 
ok got it
mystic  [author] 26 Aug @ 2:46pm 
Sure, and btw if you want to suggest something, say it in the pinned discussion
abidin1618 26 Aug @ 2:20am 
it is correct size. and may i suggest revamp for trappist-1 system?
mystic  [author] 25 Aug @ 1:43pm 
Yw, lmk if it's correct now
abidin1618 25 Aug @ 3:42am 
thank you so much!
mystic  [author] 25 Aug @ 3:16am 
@abidin1618 I've added proplyd 133-353 to my mod now
mystic  [author] 23 Aug @ 4:22am 
Sure, I'll do it tomorrow since it's quite late for me rn
abidin1618 23 Aug @ 3:51am 
can you fix the size of proplyd 133-353 to be 7,82 ± 0,81 jupiter raddi
abidin1618 23 Aug @ 3:31am 
21 aug kepler-186 f looks so much better
mystic  [author] 16 Aug @ 4:32pm 
Alr
Three 16 Aug @ 1:13pm 
I got data from here https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/overview/HD%20189733
Three 16 Aug @ 1:10pm 
the actual lumniosity, according to my calculations for hd 189733 b is 0.0048 solar lumniosity
Three 16 Aug @ 9:56am 
you may wanna fix hd 189733 b, as a red dwarf, it is more lumnious than its orange dwarf companion, so you may wanna lower down the lumniosity
mystic  [author] 29 Jul @ 2:51am 
@MILER What happens if you put Kaewkosin into the search?
MILER 28 Jul @ 8:40pm 
unable to search for gliese 3470 ，please fix it
mystic  [author] 22 Jul @ 3:42am 
I think it's because it's super close to a neutron star + The neutron star it orbits is super hot as well
Bloomberg49 21 Jul @ 5:51am 
Why PSR J1719-1438 b is hot at 50,000C?
mystic  [author] 20 Jul @ 7:03pm 
Ty
johnmoscasanderson 20 Jul @ 10:56am 
awesome i love things that add stuff and revamp stuff keep up the good work!
mystic  [author] 16 Jul @ 3:55am 
@abidin1618 It says "hot" because if you look at the planet's orbit, it's quite elliptical and there's a point where it gets super close to it's parent star
mystic  [author] 16 Jul @ 3:48am 
Also, it's not rings btw, it's most likely a protoplanetary disk (A disk of dust and gas, it's how planets are formed)
mystic  [author] 16 Jul @ 3:47am 
@basmuhendis I did, just search J1407 b
basmuhendis 16 Jul @ 2:30am 
can you add j1407-b (the one with giant rings)
abidin1618 16 Jul @ 1:32am 
i found a bug on kepler-22b its called HOT oceanic aquaria while the temperute being -19C
mystic  [author] 15 Jul @ 6:18pm 
Thx
Three 15 Jul @ 5:20pm 
peak
mystic  [author] 12 Jul @ 5:00pm 
Ty
abidin1618 12 Jul @ 6:30am 
damn! this is so amazing! keep it up!