Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm taking a break. No ETA. Don't reupload.
He doesn’t get the whole concept: light tanks rely on speed and dodging, while heavy fortress builds rely on armor and firepower. That’s what makes the battles interesting. Yet he whines because his minute‑made lawnmower gets vaporized by a high‑tech superweapon. What did he expect — to face‑tank a death ray with scrap metal?
Also, the lightning storm effect puts a heavy load on the game.
I’m suggesting this because on maps with a high ceiling, these visual effects can cause noticeable FPS drops.
because there are balance issues due to their too much damage they break the gameplay
What is currently known is that 1. Do not place turrets on the armor and rotate them; they will definitely disappear
2. Leave some space for the turret to prevent structural deformation from causing insufficient space and making it impossible to place the turret