Space Engineers

Space Engineers

WHI - M8 Mining Ship
19 Comments
Dots 18 Sep @ 2:45am 
FunkyBacon you the best!
FunkyBacon  [author] 17 Sep @ 11:03am 
A new variant have been made that should fix the fuel issues as it now have more than twice the capacity. Also it looks better, imo.
https://gtm.steamproxy.vip/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3569874054
Dots 13 Aug @ 5:42am 
Like i mentioned even without a script I was unable to do much with this ship. I will deconstruct this one and build up your older variants or maybe see if i find the ion version somewhere in your workshop and have that instead.
FunkyBacon  [author] 13 Aug @ 3:53am 
I don't know how PAM handles miners but if you don't needlessly burn fuel it should last for a full trip regardless of distance. It does burn a lot of fuel that is true, but brake/reverse thrusters are on a toggle for a reason so that you can easily drift forward without wasting energy on constantly stopping and going when mining.
Dots 13 Aug @ 12:38am 
[comment below had to be segmented due to 1000 character limit. You read top comment then go down to understand me.]
Dots 13 Aug @ 12:36am 
This ship is a major flop. I love all WHI line vehicles but one single tap and poof. 5% of hydrogen tanks GONE. Operation range is less then 5 Km due to how much hydrogen it uses. I set mine up with PAM script and it barely was able to mine 100 meters in before it was stuck in the hole. I had to rescue this ship multiple times because it ran out of hydrogen. I just hope that someday M9 will come out with a better cargo to hydrogen usage balance.
Dots 13 Aug @ 12:35am 
If it can't travel or mine for as long as the cargo ship has fuel then its not really a efficient ship. I really really love WHI ship lines but this one is just not it. If the ship can't even farm a whole 4x4 (that is 4 rows width and height) and with a depth of 100 meters deep before having to return to base then I would say to stay away from this creation. I mentioned cargo to hydrogen balance.
Dots 13 Aug @ 12:35am 
I meant when cargo is full the hydrogen tanks should be at 50% at least so that makes you able to fly to 50km asteroid and be able to do the job and come back. This ship cannot perform this task as-is. I even tried mining by hand without script on single player survival settings x10 on cargo but no dice. I hope the ship maker comes out with a better design.
Kaito 13 Feb, 2024 @ 10:02pm 
I'd trade my kingdom for a planet-capable version of this.
critter4ya 20 Dec, 2023 @ 7:43pm 
just built it and the batteries won't recharge? i am docked to station with large reactors and still won't recharge any ideas?
FunkyBacon  [author] 3 Sep, 2023 @ 5:20am 
@Doctorstaik.
Yes it does. 4 big ones in the back, only the middle one is an actual connector. Plus a row of small ones on the left and right side.
Doctorstaik 3 Sep, 2023 @ 4:26am 
does it have ejectors for unwanted stone? good work though
Green_ya 7 Feb, 2023 @ 1:34am 
Of all the WHI ships, only the M4 is not suitable for PAM due to the hexagonal arrangement of the drills. The exception is M4-MK2. He has a rectangular profile.
Green_ya 7 Feb, 2023 @ 1:30am 
@lkcarfrey, yes. You can try it. But i thing ship is too big. I use M1-M3 for PAM
FunkyBacon  [author] 27 Jan, 2023 @ 2:51am 
@lkcarfrey
I have no idea as I never used that script before. But feel free to put it on there and give it a try if you want to.
lkcarfrey 26 Jan, 2023 @ 6:43pm 
Is this P.A.M. capable?
==>KT<== JudgeKane 11 Jan, 2023 @ 2:25pm 
Any plans to do a vertical miner in your WHI style?

This one is begging for a PAM script loading in 😊
Hawkwar 6 Jan, 2023 @ 12:07am 
Might as well just build a large grid ship at this point lol
==>KT<== JudgeKane 5 Jan, 2023 @ 10:59am 
Maximum overkill, love it!