安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
updated for v1.2.1 = fixed the o2, by adding 2 airtight boxes instead of the sloped blocks at the ceiling above armor locker+fridge. the small slope there is what caused the breach with the latest update.
@Curben Justic: if you juggle things around a bit probably. but in such small ship you usally end up with some things missing due to the size.
Only thing, I believe it fails to be airtight as drills are NOT airtight blocks IINM.
Ability to adjust pitch and roll amounts in alpha 12 makes this easier to fly. Just have to be careful when using WASD since you can't adjust engine thrust.
maybe you changed some blocks that seal it to the front drills. sadly drills are not air tight.
I especially like the view from the cockpit.
@Kemloor: the overall flightmodel was changed. if you spread the thrusters out a bit you get decent manoeuvrability without rcs.
for the pitman specifily: i first had a rcs in there (+cpu extender, basilcy where the armor locker is and the 16k cargo was only 8k). found with or without rcs it still is very unstable and very zippy, think thats mostly due to the small size and the strong thrusters. since the rcs did not fix tthat and made barely a difference i left it out, but you have space to put a rcs in there if you like ;)