安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
If not then the other way round :'D nah the above should make it work mate.
http://remacle.org/bloodwolf/historiens/diodore/livre5a.htm Book V chapt. 28 (XVIII)
In this sentence, Diodorus is effectively talking about the beard, whait? Precisely beard and mustache, but not for all, only for some nobles (οἱ δ´ εὐγενεῖς).
In others hands recent archeological excavations have permitted to found a lot of aesthetic ustencils: shaver, tweezers, comb...
They were very careful of themselves
Also, we have iconographies like on coins, there is no presence of beards or whiskers. The hair is always clean and silky.
You should reconsider your perception of History.
Your first quote, I took it in latin, cuz it always better (i did latin, don't know for you, that's probably why you are a kind of ignorant, btw how old are you?)
"capilloque sunt promisso atque omni parte corporis rasa praeter caput et labrum superius."
Caius Julius Caesar
This is about Brittons, not Gaulish. I know that it's look similar, but they are quiet differents.
You're dumb, and you know nothing about history cuz: first, you just read english translation, all translation are not always accurate, and secondly you totally forgot the subjectivity. I mean the fact that these texts are made by greek or latin authors. Just for your ignorance, greek claim themselve as superior and call other people barbaric. Don't forget that Celts have reach Delph, in case you don't know cuz you are probably dumb.
Therefore it is probable that they oriented their text to make the Celts (Gaulish) appear as barbarians by attributing them typical elements of the barabares like mustaches. Same for romans, don't forget that Tectosage have reached Rome in -300. Again, romans have a fucking and (obvious for a person who knows History) negative apriori on them.
Every fucking historians don't trust Ceaser because he is not objective, they take a step back. All that is written is used to serve the interest of caesar....
First don't put gaullish with britons.
Also, lmao mother of gods Caeser, aka the most non objective man. Did you never learn to stand back on the primary sources because they got a lot a bias ?
It is not objective, we have external sources, and even coming from Romans who specify that the Gauls are extremely careful of their appearance see even more than the Romans themselves...
We found a lot of shavers, comb etc.
Saying that Gaullish weared mustache is like saying that vikings got horns on top of their helmets...
You’re 100 years late on Celtic archaeology and history. Go back to watch Barbarians.
"All the Britons paint themselves with woad, which produces a dark blue color; and for this reason they are much more frightful in appearance in battle. They permit their hair to grow long, shaving all parts of the body except the head and the upper lip." -Julius Caesar on the Britons
Hello, for me the warriors no longer have bodies !!!? we only see their helmets.