Train Simulator Classic

Train Simulator Classic

Yard Work (Victorville)
Počet komentářů: 25
ravensview 17. říj. v 20.03 
F7 show car units doesn't work, so can's marshal. Sigh.
RBJets  [autor] 3. úno. 2024 v 6.55 
Glad it worked for you Rob. :)
robmerlo 3. úno. 2024 v 3.07 
Finally got this one worked had heaps problems with it freezing but redown loaded it ran ok well done thank you
john 9. lis. 2020 v 3.38 
Hint - As you start your journey to siding 7. Ensure you have the right amount of wagons , just check the numbers of the last two wagons on F4. On my second attempt got a cross yet again, found out on attaching the long consist , that somehow I'd decoupled the last two wagons.
RBJets  [autor] 8. lis. 2020 v 14.30 
Check the map, East Victorville is north of where you start.
RBJets  [autor] 8. lis. 2020 v 12.24 
You take the cars from 6 and stage them on 5. in short just put everything that is NOT a Container wagon on 5 and keep the 4 containers.
john.p.mackay 8. lis. 2020 v 12.23 
Sorry to ask that I am confused about this scenario . The two locomotives did go via Victorville Siding 5. Now the second thing is " Marshall 362793, 31911, 363606, 202585, 601411, 302612, 242232, 242099 at East Victorville Siding 5.. I don't see any 8 cars on that track. Where do I find this to marshall the cars? I am not sure where is East Victoriville Siding 5? All I know that I did run two locomotives through Victorville Siding 5 but not East Victorville Siding 5. Sorry

Thank you,

John
RBJets  [autor] 6. lis. 2020 v 8.13 
Cool, no problem, welcome. :)
john 5. lis. 2020 v 21.21 
Job done - thanks for the additional info.
RBJets  [autor] 3. lis. 2020 v 20.59 
I'm also going to make another version and remove the SD75 which the only thing really used in this scenario is the rolling stock.
john 3. lis. 2020 v 18.26 
Thanks will try again to-morrow
RBJets  [autor] 3. lis. 2020 v 14.29 
Hey John, you need to sort out the 4 Container wagons that are mixed with the freight on siding 6. 1) Put ALL non Container cars on siding 5, keep the 4 Container wagons. 2) Couple the 4 Container wagons to the formation of Container wagons on siding 2. 3) Then take everything on siding 2 down to the final drop point: siding 7. Marshalling can be confusing but I dont think that was the issue.
RBJets  [autor] 3. lis. 2020 v 14.02 
No it isn't a timed scenario. Sometime duplicate car numbers will give an X but I always check for that. I'll look again.
john 3. lis. 2020 v 10.22 
On a second attempt, first resulted in doing the same mistake as others. But this time after shuffling the wagons a bit more, counting the amount of wagons in the assembled consist heading for siding 7 and then double checking I had the right wagon numbers. Still got an x on backing into siding 7 - is this a timed scenario?
RBJets  [autor] 23. led. 2020 v 12.22 
Cool, thanks and welcome Rammy. :)
Rammy 23. led. 2020 v 12.12 
Just Corrected my Mistake and Completed Scenario.
Rammy 23. led. 2020 v 11.43 
Very Enjoyable Scenario made the same mistake as Bruce Rail Fan will have to do it again. Thank You.
RBJets  [autor] 2. led. 2020 v 18.08 
It tells you the 4 wagons numbers needed on the way up to the siding. :)
Bruce Rail Fan 2. led. 2020 v 16.20 
As in a previous comment did not know I had to collect the 4 double stack container wagons and failed the drop step. Still a nice scenario.
RBJets  [autor] 19. pro. 2019 v 20.49 
In the future, sure. :)
Robbie 19. pro. 2019 v 20.23 
The new Havre to Shelby High line extention was released today there are two versions a non U S version and a U S version I was just wondering if you’re going to do a series on this new route
RBJets  [autor] 4. pro. 2019 v 18.32 
Great, thanks for the info Warren. :)
wadawes 4. pro. 2019 v 18.26 
OK RB, it's ok now. It was my mistake. After the marshalling tasks were completed, I didn't realise that the four double stacked container wagons that we cut out had to be included in the trip to Victorville Siding 7.
After adding them, it all worked fine.
Nice scenario and thanks again for making it.
Cheers, Warren
RBJets  [autor] 4. pro. 2019 v 12.47 
Cool, thanks ojje, always let me know if you have issues with any scenario. :)
ojje 4. pro. 2019 v 12.13 
Thanks for fixing RB. Now it worked just fine. Great scenario! :-)